Comments on: Nikon AF-S 14-24 mm and 24-70 mm F2.8G ED: Digital Photography Review

By: Roger koul

Roger koul — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:02:10 +0000

Hi,
I just wanted to know as compared to 17-35 mm Nikon f2.8 in terms of sharpness and contrast (Not talking about wide angle) How 14-24 Nikon F 2.8 excel. I mean if some is to buy a lens what would you recomend him (Not talking about wide angle).

Thanks
Roger

By: Simon

Simon — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:00:03 +0000

12MP is already a lot, you know, the biggest/best photo printers that anybody is likely to have at home (Epson R2400 etc) can’t use more than that. So if you accept that the difference between 12MP and 21MP is meaningless for most people, the D3 gives you more FPS and the high ISO performance really has to be seen to be believed (yes I have one.) Offer me 21MP without sacrificing any of the strengths of the D3 and I might consider it…

By: James

James — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:24:19 +0000

Canon? Yuk! We all know the focusing issues will make it unusable!

By: Doug Stetner

Doug Stetner — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:03:17 +0000

Come on Kevin this is what you *really* want….

http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canoneos1dsmarkiii/